Breaking Down Nick Reiner’s Day In Court

Nick Reiner had an eventful day in court … he is now being repped by a public defender and his outgoing protection lawyer made it clear he thinks Nick is NOT responsible of murdering his mother and father … however the best way Alan Jackson made his assertion has our antennas up.

We obtained into each angle of Nick’s look in a Downtown Los Angeles courtroom Wednesday on “TMZ Live” … the change of lawyer, an attention-grabbing assertion from the D.A., a doable protection technique, and we even had a reporter contained in the courthouse who informed us how Nick was appearing.

The huge factor right here is Jackson is out, and a public defender is in … however Jackson left some breadcrumbs that appear to point Nick’s obtained a method prepared and a brand new protection crew could also be coming in to take over.

Based on the best way Jackson stated Nick wasn’t responsible of murdering Rob and Michele Reiner, it seems like Nick goes to plead not responsible by cause of madness … one thing we have informed you about for weeks now. Listen once more to Jackson fastidiously — he says, “pursuant to the law in California Nick Reiner is not guilty of murder.”

Nick’s new public defender is Kimberly Greene … but when Nick goes to go together with the not responsible by cause of madness protection, it is a good guess he’ll want a brand new protection crew with the assets to name in specialists to mount that protection … one thing a public defender simply cannot do.

Inside the courtroom, our Alexa Klohn had eyes on Nick … and he or she says he appeared calm, cool and picked up … and even interested in all of the media protecting his each transfer.

After Jackson informed people to “take it to the bank” that Nick just isn’t responsible, it was Nathan Hochman‘s flip to talk … and the Los Angeles County District Attorney stated prosecutors have been assured a jury would unanimously discover Nick responsible of murdering his mother and father.

Hochman’s rebuttal was robust, however we clarify why it is type of a wierd assertion for the D.A. to make at this level within the case.